The Project Gutenberg eBook of A Review of the Frogs of the Hyla bistincta Group
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online
at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States,
you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.
Title: A Review of the Frogs of the Hyla bistincta Group
Author: William Edward Duellman
Release date: June 2, 2010 [eBook #32653]
Most recently updated: January 6, 2021
Language: English
Credits: Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net
*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A REVIEW OF THE FROGS OF THE HYLA BISTINCTA GROUP ***
University of Kansas Publications
Museum of Natural History
Volume 15, No. 9, pp. 469-491, 4 figs.
March 2, 1964
A Review of the Frogs
Of the Hyla bistincta Group
BY
WILLIAM E. DUELLMAN
University of Kansas
Lawrence
1964
University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History
Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman, Henry S. Fitch,
Theodore H. Eaton, Jr.
Volume 15, No. 9, 469-491, 4 figs.
Published March 2, 1964
University of Kansas
Lawrence, Kansas
PRINTED BY THE STATE PRINTER
TOPEKA, KANSAS
1964
29-8590
[Pg 471]
A Review of the Frogs
Of the Hyla bistincta Group
BY
WILLIAM E. DUELLMAN
CONTENTS
PAGE
Introduction 471
Acknowledgments 471
The Hyla Bistincta Group 472
Analysis of Characters 473
Key to the Species of the Hyla Bistincta Group 474
Accounts of the Species 475
Hyla bistincta Cope 475
Hyla charadricola new species 478
Hyla robertsorum Taylor 481
Hyla pachyderma Taylor 485
Hyla crassa (Brocchi) 486
Relationships 489
Literature Cited 491
INTRODUCTION
In the mountainous regions of Middle America there are several
groups of hylid frogs that inhabit mountain streams. Some of these
groups, such as Plectrohyla and Ptychohyla, have been elevated to
generic rank, whereas others are retained in the large and complex
genus Hyla. In the mountains of México five species of hylids that
seem to compose a phyletic unit are herein referred to as the Hyla
bistincta group. Since 1955 I have been accumulating specimens
of, and data on, this group with the result that all specimens known
to me, including the types of all named taxa, have been studied.
Detailed observations have been made on the ecology and life histories
of three of the species; the other two species are known to me
only from preserved specimens.
Acknowledgments
For permission to examine specimens in their care I am indebted to
Charles M. Bogert, American Museum of Natural History (AMNH); Doris M.
Cochran, United States National Museum (USNM); Jean Guibé, Museum
National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHN); Robert F. Inger, Chicago
Natural History Museum (CNHM); Hobart M. Smith, University of Illinois
Museum of Natural History (UIMNH); Charles F. Walker, University of
Michigan Museum of Zoology (UMMZ). (Abbreviations of institutions
given above in parentheses are used throughout; the Museum of Natural
History, University of Kansas is abbreviated KU.)
[Pg 472]
For their willing assistance in the field I am grateful to Ann S.
Duellman, Dale L. Hoyt, and John Wellman. Permits for collecting in
México were generously issued by the late Ing. Luis Macías Arellano,
Departamento de la Fauna Silvestre, Dirección General de Caza. The
drawings in figures 1 and 3 were executed by Gail Selfridge. This
research has been supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF
G-9827).
THE HYLA BISTINCTA GROUP
The five species comprising the Hyla bistincta group are
moderate-sized hylids having rather blunt heads and robust bodies.
The fingers are long and have little webbing (Fig. 1). The skin of
the dorsum is thick and glandular, but not tuberculate. An anal
sheath is present. The skull is rather broad, flat, and solidly roofed.
The ethmoid is broad, curved downward laterally, and solidly
sutured to the frontoparietal. The nasals are broad, sutured for
their entire width with the ethmoid, and broadly in contact medially.
The premaxillaries are in contact medially; each has a long, flat
nasal process. The quadratojugal is absent, and the maxillary
tapers to a point posteriorly. There is no squamosal-maxillary
connection. The maxillary and premaxillary teeth are rather long,
bifid, and moderately spatulate. Some teeth on the premaxillary
and anterior part of the maxillary are hooked. The vomerine teeth
are spatulate and bifid. A broad, flat, ossified prepollex is present
but does not project as a spine. The known tadpoles have ventral
mouths, ⅔ tooth-rows, two or more rows of labial papillae, and
long tails with low fins.

Fig. 1. Palmar view of right hand of:
a.—Hyla robertsorum (KU 57661),
b.—Hyla charadricola (KU 58414). × 3.
[Pg 473]
As thus defined the Hyla bistincta group can be distinguished
from all other groups of Middle American frogs by the combination
of absence of the quadratojugal, non-projecting prepollex, long
fingers with little webbing, and stream-inhabiting tadpoles having
⅔ tooth rows and two or more rows of labial papillae.
Possibly Hyla arborescandens and Hyla hazelae belong in this
group. Because these species are somewhat different from the included
species and because their tadpoles are as yet unknown, I
have refrained from including these two species in the Hyla bistincta
group. Taylor (1948:261) assigned Hyla proboscidea (= H. dalquesti)
and (1949:272) Hyla cyclomaculata to this group, but because
these two species have a quadratojugal and notably different
tadpoles, they are excluded from the group.
Frogs of the genus Plectrohyla closely resemble species in the
Hyla bistincta group but differ principally in having a projecting
prepollex. In the highlands of Costa Rica a group of species, of
which Hyla moesta is best known, resembles species in the Hyla
bistincta group. At present insufficient information is available
on the Costa Rican species to determine their affinities.
Analysis of Characters
The characters used in the systematic study of the frogs in this
group are those usually employed in anuran systematics. Of the
various measurements and proportions, the snout-vent length and
the relative size of the tympanum to the eye apparently are of more
taxonomic importance than the others (Table 1). In all of the
species the tympanum is at least partially covered by a heavy,
dermal supratympanic fold, and in some specimens of H. pachyderma
the tympanum is completely obscured. In two species (H.
bistincta and H. charadricola) the snout is square, whereas in the
other species it is round.
The fingers are long and slender in H. crassa, pachyderma, and
robertsorum and somewhat shorter with more webbing in H.
bistincta and charadricola. Breeding males of Hyla pachyderma
have moderately large nuptial spines; the other species have small
spines, except H. charadricola in which spines apparently are
absent. A well-defined thoracic fold is present in H. pachyderma,
and a weak fold is present in H. robertsorum; the other species
lack folds. In all species there is an anal sheath; this sheath is
longest in H. bistincta, in which the anal opening is directed ventrally
at the level of the lower edge of the thighs.[Pg 474]
Table 1.—Comparison of Certain Measurements and Proportions in the
Species of the Hyla bistincta Group. (Data From Adult Males;
Means Are Given in Parentheses Below the Ranges.)
Species | N | Snout-vent length | Tibia length Snout-vent length | Head width Snout-vent length | Tympanum Eye |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H. bistincta | 38 | 43.0-53.8 (46.3) | 0.47-0.52 (0.49) | 0.32-0.37 (0.34) | 0.35-0.48 (0.42) |
H. charadricola | 10 | 35.3-44.4 (40.4) | 0.50-0.54 (0.52) | 0.31-0.33 (0.32) | 0.30-0.37 (0.34) |
H. robertsorum | 26 | 39.9-47.9 (43.1) | 0.48-0.51 (0.49) | 0.30-0.36 (0.32) | 0.36-0.47 (0.41) |
H. pachyderma | 1 | 39.9 | 0.53 | 0.32 | ... |
H. crassa | 1 | 53.7 | 0.50 | 0.33 | 0.28 |
Frogs in this group are rather drab in appearance. The dorsal
color varies from dull green to various shades of brown. The most
distinct aspect of the coloration is the different color patterns on
the flanks and posterior surfaces of the thighs. The flanks in all
species are marked with spots or reticulations.
Hyla bistincta differs from other members of the group in having
vocal slits and a distensible vocal sac. Only this species has been
reported to call (Shannon, 1951:473). Insofar as is known, the
other species are mute. Examination of skeletal preparations of
H. bistincta, charadricola, and robertsorum and X-rays of the other
species shows no notable specific differences in the osteology. Since
the tadpoles of only H. bistincta (Duellman, 1961:47) and H. robertsorum
(Rabb and Mosimann, 1955) are known, larval characters are
of limited use in intra-group systematics.
Key to the Species of the Hyla bistincta Group
1. Snout, in dorsal profile, short and bluntly rounded; canthus rounded,
sometimes indistinct, vocal slits absent 2
Snout, in dorsal profile, longer, squared; canthus distinct, vocal slits
present or absent 4
2. Feet webbed to base of discs; dorsum dull olive green; flanks having
cream-colored spots H. crassa, p. 486
Feet not webbed to base of discs; dorsum brown 3
3. Tarsal fold strong; thoracic fold heavy; webbing on feet extending to
middle of penultimate phalanx of fourth toe; distinct white stripe above
anus; cluster of largo spines on thumb in breeding males,
H. pachyderma, p. 485
[Pg 475]
Tarsal fold weak and short; thoracic fold absent or barely indicated;
webbing of feet extending to base of penultimate phalanx of fourth
toe; no distinct white stripe above anus; nuptial tuberosities in breeding
males consisting of small spines H. robertsorum, p. 481
4. Tarsal fold strong; anal flap elongate; anus opening at lower edge of
femur; dorsum tan or brown; flanks mottled with cream and brown;
venter immaculate creamy white; no anal stripe; vocal slits present,
H. bistincta, p. 475
Tarsal fold faint and short; anal flap not elongate; anus opening at
middle of femur; dorsum olive-green with black reticulations; flanks
greenish gray with brown or black spots; a row of white flecks above
and below anus, vocal slits absent H. charadricola, p. 478
ACCOUNTS OF THE SPECIES
In the following accounts complete synonymies are given for each
species. In each account one specimen is described in detail; after
this description the variation is discussed. In the list of specimens
examined, localities are arranged alphabetically within the states,
which also are given in alphabetical order. Localities given in
italics are not shown on the accompanying maps (Figs. 2 and 4)
due to crowding of symbols.
Hyla bistincta Cope
Hyla bistincta Cope, Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc, 17:87, August, 1877
[Holotype.—USNM 32261 from "most probably Veracruz," México; Francis
Sumichrast collector]. Brocchi, Étude des batraciens de l'Amérique
Centrale, p. 43, 1881. Boulenger, Catalogue Batrachia Salientia, 2nd
Ed., p. 401, February 1, 1882. Sumichrast, La Naturaleza, 6:81, 1882.
Cope, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 32:14, 1887; Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus.,
34:351, 1889. Günther, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Reptilia and
Batrachia, pp. 265-6, June, 1901. Díaz de León, Indice de los
batracios que se encuentran en la República Mexicana, p. 17, June,
1904. Nieden, Das Tierreich, Amphibia, Anura I, p. 247, June, 1923.
Kellogg, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 160:163-164, March 31, 1932. Taylor,
Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, 50:50-53, April 21, 1937; Univ. Kansas
Sci. Bull., 26:389, November 27, 1940. Taylor and Smith, Proc. U. S.
Natl. Mus., 194:87, June 7, 1948. Taylor, Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat.
Hist., 1:261, August 16, 1948; Copeia, no. 4:272-273, December 15,
1949. Smith and Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 33:346, March 20,
1950 [Type locality restricted to Acultzingo, Veracruz, México]. Rabb
and Mosimann, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 563:6-9, March
29, 1955. Duellman, Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 15:47-49,
December 20, 1961.
Hyla bistincta labeculata Shannon, Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus.,
101:470-473, figs. 92a, 93d, May 17, 1951 [Holotype.—USNM 123689 from
San Lucas Camotlán, Oaxaca, México; Walter S. Miller collector]. Smith
and Williams, Herpetologica, 19:23, April 11, 1963.
Hyla bistincta bistincta, Shannon, Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 101:472,
May 17, 1951. Shannon and Werler, Herpetologica, 11:85, July 15, 1955.
Smith and Williams, Herpetologica, 19:23, April 11, 1963.
Diagnosis.—Maximum snout-vent length in males 54 mm.; snout in
dorsal profile truncate; tarsal fold strong; inner metatarsal tubercle large,
high, and elongate; outer metatarsal tubercle absent; webbing on foot extending
to middle of antepenultimate phalanx of fourth toe; nuptial spines on thumb small;
thoracic fold absent; anal opening at level of lower edge of femur; dorsum
[Pg 476]
brown or tan; belly cream-color; flanks creamy yellow with brown
reticulations or spots; anal stripe absent; vocal slits present.
Description.—The following description is based on KU 68078 from
Uruapan, Michoacán, México. Adult male having a snout-vent length of
43.2 mm.; tibia length, 22.1 mm., 51.1 per cent of snout-vent length;
foot length (measured from proximal edge of inner metatarsal tubercle
to tip of longest toe), 20.8 mm.; greatest width of head, 15.4 mm.,
35.6 per cent of snout-vent length; head length, 13.9 mm., 32.1 per
cent of snout-vent length; diameter of eye, 5.1 mm.; diameter of
tympanum, 2.4 mm., 47.1 per cent of diameter of eye. Snout in lateral
profile bluntly rounded, in dorsal profile truncate; canthus
pronounced, rounded, not angular; loreal region slightly concave; lips
thick, round, not flaring; nostrils slightly protuberant; internarial
distance, 3.4 mm.; interorbital distance, 4.5 mm., somewhat broader
than width of eyelid, 3.5 mm. A heavy dermal fold from posterior
corner of eye above tympanum and curved downward to insertion of
forearm; tympanum round, its diameter slightly more than its distance
from eye. Forearm not robust; row of small pustules on ventral surface
of forearm; fold on wrist; prepollex moderately enlarged, covered with
small, horny, nuptial spines continuous on edge of digit; row of
spines on inner surface of second finger; subarticular tubercles
large, round, none bifid; supernumerary tubercles rather large, round;
palmar tubercles rather small, flat, elliptical; fingers long,
moderately slender; length of fingers from shortest to longest,
1-2-4-3; discs moderately large, that on third finger slightly larger
than tympanum; rudimentary web between first and second and between
second and third fingers; web between third and fourth fingers
extending about one-fourth length of fourth finger. Heels overlap by
about one-third length of shank when hind limbs adpressed; tibiotarsal
articulation extends to anterior edge of eye; tarsal fold strong,
extending to heel; inner metatarsal tubercle large, high, and
elongate; outer metatarsal tubercle absent; subarticular tubercles
moderately large, round; supernumerary tubercles small, in single rows
on proximal segments of digits; toes moderately short; length of toes
from shortest to longest, 1-2-3-5-4, third and fifth toes about equal
in length; toes about two-thirds webbed; web extending to middle of
antepenultimate phalanx of fourth toe, to discs of first, second, and
fifth toes, and to base of penultimate phalanx of third toe; discs
rather small, about two-thirds size of those on fingers. Anal opening
at level of lower edge of thighs; anal sheath elongate, deeply creased
medially; transverse dermal fold above anus. Skin of dorsal surfaces
of head, body, and limbs faintly areolate; skin of chin, belly, and
ventral surfaces of thighs granular, that of ventral surfaces of
limbs, except thighs, areolate; thoracic fold absent. Tongue nearly
round, slightly longer than wide, shallowly notched behind and barely
free posteriorly. Vomerine teeth 4-4, situated on rounded vomerine
ridges between rather small ovoid inner nares; vocal slits present,
situated along posterior edge of each ramus.
Color (in alcohol) pale brown on dorsal surfaces of head, body, and
limbs; flanks and anterior surfaces of thighs creamy white with dark
brown reticulations; posterior surfaces of thighs tan with creamy
white spots; belly cream-color; anal stripe absent.
Color (in life) pale tan on dorsal surfaces; flanks and anterior
surfaces of thighs pale creamy yellow with purplish brown
reticulations; posterior surfaces of thighs tan with yellow spots;
ventral surfaces yellow; iris pale copper-color.
[Pg 477]
Variation.—There is little variation in structure. The total number
of vomerine teeth varies from 6 to 14. In some individuals the
supratympanic fold covers the upper part of the tympanum, but at least
the lower part of the tympanum is always visible. The extent of the
webbing between the toes varies from three-fourths to two-thirds
complete. Usually the web extends to some point on the antepenultimate
phalanx of the fourth toe, but in some specimens the web extends to
the base of the penultimate phalanx.
In the large series of specimens from Uruapan, Michoacán, the
coloration of the flanks and anterior surfaces of the thighs varies
from nearly uniform creamy yellow with only fine dark reticulations to
bold reticulations enclosing yellow spots. Some specimens from Oaxaca
and Veracruz have slightly different markings on the flanks; in these
the dark pigment is in the form of irregular spots or dashes, instead
of reticulations.
There is considerable variation in color in the living frogs. The
dorsum varies from greenish tan and pale yellowish tan to reddish
brown, and some individuals are dark chocolate brown.
Remarks.—Shannon (1951:470) named Hyla bistincta labeculata on
the basis of a single male from San Lucas Camotlán, Oaxaca; he
diagnosed the subspecies as differing from Hyla bistincta bistincta
by having "the gray reticulation of the sides entirely broken up into
elongate black blotches; tarsal fold moderately elevated." The
condition of the tarsal fold is characteristic of the species. The
dispersion of dark pigment on the flanks is variable. The type of
Hyla bistincta labeculata (USNM 123689) is extreme in the
development of dark dashes on the flanks, but this condition is
approached in several specimes from Oaxaca and Veracruz. For example,
in some specimens from Cumbres de Acultzingo, Veracruz, the mottling
on the flanks is bold; in others the flanks are reticulated. The
specimen from San Vicente, Oaxaca, has black dashes on the flanks
(Smith and Williams, 1963:23), whereas a specimen from Cerro San
Felipe, Oaxaca, has no pattern on the flanks. In general, specimens
from western México have reticulate mottling on the flanks as compared
with the marbling on the flanks in specimens from eastern México. On
the basis of available data, the recognition of subspecies in Hyla
bistincta is unwarranted.
The tadpoles of this species described by Duellman (1961:47) are like
those of Hyla robertsorum in having ⅔ tooth-rows, peglike
serrations on the beaks, and long, rounded tails. At Uruapan tadpoles
were found in a rocky stream on April 24, 1956, and metamorphosing
young were found there on August 2, 1956. A completely metamorphosed
juvenile has a snout-vent length of 24.8 mm.
Hyla bistincta is found only along streams, where individuals can be
seen clinging to vines and other vegetation closely over-hanging
fast-moving parts of the stream.
[Pg 478]
Distribution.—Hyla bistincta occurs at elevations from 1400 to
2600 meters in the mountains of the Sierra Madre Occidental in western
Jalisco southward through the Cordillera Volcánica in Michoacán,
México, and Morelos, the Sierra de Coalcomán in Michoacán, and the
Sierra Madre del Sur in Guerrero and Oaxaca, and thence northward in
the Sierra Madre Oriental to central Veracruz (Fig. 2).
Specimens examined.—Guerrero: Omiltemi, UIMNH 38023-5. Jalisco: 25
km. SE Autlán, UMMZ 102076. Mexico: 19 km. W Villa Victoria, UIMNH
28162, USNM 114513. Morelos: Cuernavaca, USNM 121523; 3 km. N
Cuernavaca, UIMNH 28168-70. Michoacan: Cerro San Andrés, UMMZ 102075;
Dos Aguas, UMMZ 119193; 12.5 km. ENE Dos Aguas, UMMZ 119194; Los
Conejos, UMMZ 94238-40; Uruapan, KU 68077-8, 69093 (skeleton), UIMNH
20457, 28167, UMMZ 85452-3, 112838, 112839 (16), 115231 (tadpoles),
115232, 115233 (12), 121515, S-1699 (skeleton), S-1826 (skeleton),
USNM 114514-5, 114517-24. Oaxaca: Cerro San Felipe, UIMNH 28163; Pluma
Hidalgo, AMNH 13447; San Lucas Camotlán, USNM 123689; San Vincente,
UIMNH 51346 (Smith and Williams, 1963:23). Veracruz: no specific
locality, USNM 32261; Cumbres de Acultzingo, CNHM 105482-3, UIMNH
28164-6, 49133-4, USNM 114525.

Fig. 2. Map showing locality records for Hyla
bistincta and Hyla charadricola.]
Hyla charadricola new species
Holotype.—University of Kansas Museum of Natural History No. 58414
from the Río Totolapa, 14.4 kilometers by road west of Huachinango,
Puebla, México, 2280 meters; obtained by John Wellman on June 8, 1960.
Paratypes.—KU 58415-58423, same data as holotype, and UIMNH 50966,
obtained at the type locality by William E. Duellman on February 11,
1961.
Diagnosis.—Maximum snout-vent length in males, 45 mm.; snout in
dorsal profile truncate; tarsal fold short and weak; inner metatarsal
tubercle moderately large, elliptical, and flat; outer metatarsal
tubercle minute, round, and indistinct; webbing extending to base of
terminal phalanx of fourth toe; nuptial [Pg 479]spines on thumb absent;
thoracic fold absent; anal opening at level of middle of thigh; dorsum
olive-green with black reticulations; venter cream color with brown
flecks on chin; flanks pale grayish green with brown spots; anal
stripe absent; row of white flecks above and a row below anus; vocal
slits absent.
Description of Holotype.—Adult male having a snout-vent lenth of
44.4 mm.; tibia length, 22.2 mm., 50 per cent of snout-vent length;
foot length (measured from proximal edge of inner metatarsal tubercle
to tip of longest toe), 20.4 mm.; greatest width of head, 14.0 mm.,
31.5 per cent of snout-vent length; head length, 13.6 mm., 30.6 per
cent of snout-vent length; diameter of eye, 5.0 mm.; diameter of
tympanum, 1.6 mm., 32.0 per cent of diameter of eye. Snout in lateral
profile bluntly rounded, in dorsal profile truncate (Fig. 3); canthus
pronounced, rounded, not angular; loreal region slightly concave; lips
thick, rounded, not flaring; nostrils slightly protuberant;
internarial distance, 3.7 mm.; interorbital distance, 4.1 mm.,
somewhat broader than width of eyelid, 3.3 mm. A heavy dermal fold
from posterior corner of eye above tympanum and then to insertion of
forearm; tympanum round, its diameter three-fourths its distance from
eye. Forearm rather slender; a short axillary membrane; no fold on
wrist; no nuptial excrescence or spines on enlarged prepollex;
subarticular tubercles moderately small, round; none bifid; few
supernumerary tubercles on proximal segments of digits; large, flat
palmar tubercle present; fingers long and slender; length of fingers
from shortest to longest, 1-2-4-3; discs moderately large, that on
third finger about equal to diameter of tympanum; rudimentary web
between first and second fingers; web between third and fourth fingers
extending to about one-fifth length of fourth finger (Fig. 1). Heels
overlap by about one-third length of tibia when hind limbs adpressed;
tibiotarsal articulation extends to middle of eye; tarsal fold weak,
extending from moderately large, flat, elliptical inner metatarsal
tubercle to middle of tarsus; outer metatarsal tubercle minute, round,
indistinct; subarticular tubercles round; single row of small, round
supernumerary tubercles on proximal segments of each digit; toes
moderately short and slender; length of toes from shortest to longest,
1-2-3-5-4, third and fifth about equal in length; toes about
three-fourths webbed; web extending to base of terminal phalanx of
fourth toe; discs small, about two-thirds size of those on fingers.
Anal opening directed posteroventrally at middle of thighs; two
transverse dermal folds above anus; short, thin anal sheath present;
many small tubercles lateral and ventral to anal opening. Skin of
dorsum, chin, and ventral surfaces of limbs smooth; belly moderately
granular; posterior surfaces of thighs heavily granular; no thoracic
fold. Tongue nearly round, shallowly notched behind, free posteriorly
for about one-fourth its length; vomerine teeth, 3-4, long, situated
on posteroventral edges of narrow transverse vomerine ridges between
moderately large, round inner nares; no vocal slits.
Color (in alcohol) purplish brown on dorsal surfaces of head, body,
and limbs; fine darker reticulations on dorsum; flanks pale tan with
dark brown spots; posterior surfaces of thighs tan; chin creamy white
with brown spots; belly dusty white; undersides of thighs and shanks
yellow; webbing grayish brown; undersides of first two fingers dusty
white, of third and fourth fingers and of feet brown; anal stripe
absent; small white flecks above and below anal opening.
Color (in life) dark green on dorsal surfaces of head, body, and limbs;
darker green reticulations on back; flanks dusty white with dark olive-gray
[Pg 480]
mottling; dark olive-gray stripe from nostril through
eye and then to insertion of forelimb; upper lips pale green; inguinal
region, anterior and posterior surfaces of thighs dark yellowish
orange; ventral surfaces of tarsi and shanks, and webbing of feet
dusty yellow; belly white; iris silvery gold.

Fig. 3. Holotype of Hyla charadricola (KU
58414). × 1.5.
Variation.—Adult males have snout-vent lengths from 35.3 to 44.4
mm., and adult females from 43.4 to 50.9 mm. No notable variation in
structure is displayed in the type series. In some individuals the
dark reticulation on the dorsum is faint. Juveniles in life had dorsal
colorations varying from rich brown with darker reticulations to pale
green or gray with dark green reticula[Pg 481]tions. Some adults when
collected were pale green with faint or no dorsal reticulations; later
these individuals darkened. In all specimens the anal stripe is
absent, and the flanks are heavily spotted.
Comparisons.—Hyla charadricola differs from all other members of
the Hyla bistincta group in the following combination of characters:
truncate snout, green dorsum, and absence of a thoracic fold. From
other hylids that occur in the same area, Hyla charadricola differs
from Hyla miotympanum and H. arborescandens, both of which are
green dorsally, by having a truncate snout and longer fingers with
less webbing. Hyla eximia, though green, has brown dorsal spots,
shorter fingers, and a round snout. Hyla robertsorum differs in
having a round snout and brown dorsum, and Hyla taeniopus is much
larger, has transverse bands on the limbs, and has extensive webbing
between fingers.
Remarks.—At the type locality, a shallow rocky stream in pine
forest, Hyla charadricola was found beneath rocks at the edge of
fast moving sections of the stream and beneath rocks in shallow
riffles in the stream. Most of the frogs were in water. At night
they were found sitting on rocks in the stream. Hyla miotympanum,
which is abundant at the type locality, lives in bushes and beneath
rocks along the stream but usually is not found in the riffles inhabited
by Hyla charadricola. At Lago de Tejocotal Hyla charadricola
was found beneath rocks near the shore of the lake and by a
stream in the pine forest. Individuals were found on low vegetation
over-hanging a small stream in pine-oak forest four kilometers southwest
of Tianguistengo.
Five recently metamorphosed young (KU 58424-9) found at the
type locality on June 8, 1960, have snout-vent lengths of 22.4 to
24.0 (average 23.2) mm. The young are colored like the adults,
except that in life the dorsum is a brighter green and the flanks are
more yellow than tan and have less dark spotting than in adults.
Distribution.—Hyla charadricola inhabits streams in pine and
pine-oak forests at elevations of 2000 to 2300 meters in northern
Puebla and eastern Hidalgo (Fig. 2).
Specimens examined.—Hidalgo: Lago de Tejocotal, 11 km. E
Acaxochitlán, KU 58438, UMMZ 104032, 118165; 4 km. SW Tianguistengo,
KU 53811-2. Puebla: 11.7 km. W Huachinango, UMMZ 121567 (5); Río
Totolapa, 14.4 km. W Huachinango, KU 53813-5, 55624, 58414-37, 59813
(skeleton), 59886 (skeleton), MCZ 34964-5, UIMNH 50966, UMMZ 118166
(5), S-2242 (skeleton).
Hyla robertsorum Taylor
Hyla robertsorum Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 26:393-396, figs.
5-6, November 27, 1940 [Holotype.—CNHM 100124 (formerly EHT-HMS
16264) from El Chico Parque Nacional, Hidalgo, México; Mr. and Mrs.
Radclyffe Roberts and Edward H. Taylor collectors]; Univ. Kansas Sci.
Bull., 28:310, November 15, 1942. Taylor and Smith, Proc. U. S. Natl.
Mus., 95:589, June 30, 1945. Smith and Taylor, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus.,
194:87, June 17, 1948; Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 33:333, March 20,
1950. Rabb and Mosimann, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan,
563:1-9, March 29, 1955. Duellman, Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist.,
15:48, December 20, 1961.
[Pg 482]
Diagnosis.—Maximum snout-vent length in males, 48 mm.; snout in
dorsal profile rounded; tarsal fold short and weak; inner metatarsal
tubercle moderate in size and elliptical; outer metatarsal tubercle
small, round, and indistinct; webbing extending to base of penultimate
phalanx of fourth toe; nuptial spines on thumb small; weak thoracic
fold present; anal opening above level of middle of thighs; dorsum
dark brown with dark reticulations; venter brown with cream-colored
flecks; flanks brown with creamy white spots; anal stripe absent;
small white spots in anal region; vocal slits absent.
Description.—The following description is based on KU 57651 from El
Chico Parque Nacional, Hidalgo. Adult male having a snout-vent length
of 45.1 mm.; tibia length, 22.1 mm., 49.0 per cent of snout-vent
length; foot length (measured from proximal edge of inner metatarsal
tubercle to tip of longest toe), 21.5 mm.; greatest width of head,
13.7 mm., 30.4 per cent of snout-vent length; head length, 12.6 mm.,
27.9 per cent of snout-vent length; diameter of eye, 4.0 mm.; diameter
of tympanum, 1.8 mm., 45 per cent of diameter of eye. Snout short, in
lateral profile blunt, in dorsal profile round; canthus rounded;
loreal region slightly concave; lips thick, round, and not flaring;
nostrils slightly protuberant; internarial distance, 3.6 mm.;
interorbital distance, 4.0 mm., slightly broader than width of eyelid,
3.5 mm. A moderately heavy dermal fold from posterior corner of eye
above tympanum and curving downward towards insertion of forearm;
tympanum nearly round, covered by dermal fold above, its diameter
slightly less than its distance from eye. Forearm moderately robust;
distinct fold on wrist; prepollex much enlarged with patch of small
nuptial spines continuous on side of digit; similar line of nuptial
spines on inner edge of second finger; subarticular tubercles round,
moderate in size, none bifid; supernumerary tubercles small and
present only proximally; fingers long and slender; length of fingers
from shortest to longest, 1-2-4-3; discs moderately large, that on
third finger about size of tympanum; no web between first and second
fingers; rudimentary web between other fingers. Legs robust; heels
over-lap by about one-fourth length of shank when hind limbs
adpressed; tibiotarsal articulation extending to posterior corner of
eye; tarsal fold weak, extending to about middle of tarsus; inner
metatarsal tubercle moderately large, flat, and elliptical; outer
metatarsal tubercle small, round, and indistinct; subarticular
tubercles round; supernumerary tubercles small, in single row on
proximal segments of each digit; toes moderately long and slender;
length of toes from shortest to longest, 1-2-5-3-4, the fifth nearly
as long as third; toes nearly fully webbed; web extending to base of
penultimate phalanx of fourth toe and to discs on other toes; discs
small, about two-thirds size of those on fingers. Anal opening above
middle of thighs; anal sheath short, deeply creased medially; heavy
transverse dermal fold above anus; no large anal tubercles. Skin of
all dorsal surfaces, chin, and ventral surfaces of limbs, except
proximal parts of thighs, smooth; belly and proximal parts of thighs
areolate; thoracic fold present, weak. Tongue elliptical, slightly
longer than wide, not notched behind, and free posteriorly for about
one-fourth of its length; vomerine teeth 3-3, situated on small,
widely separated, transverse ridges between rather small elliptical
inner nares; no vocal slits.
Color (in alcohol) dark brown with irregular darker reticulations on
dorsal surfaces of head, body, and limbs; flanks brown with small
creamy white spots; posterior surfaces of thighs dark brown; chin
creamy tan; belly grayish brown [Pg 483]with cream-colored flecks; ventral
surfaces of limbs pale brown; webbing on feet gray; small white spots
in anal region.
Color (in life) chocolate brown with darker brown reticulations and
irregular blotches above; flanks brown with yellow spots; belly gray
to grayish brown with faint cream-colored spots; iris a deep bronze
color.
Variation.—In males the total number of vomerine teeth varies from
4 to 7. In many specimens the vomerine ridges are larger and more
closely approximated medially than in the specimen described above.
Females attain snout-vent lengths of 51 mm., have as many as 9
vomerine teeth, and have a proportionately larger tympanum than males.
Some of the largest specimens of both sexes have indistinct
cream-colored pustules scattered on the ventral surface of the
forearm. Some individuals have nearly uniform grayish brown ventral
surfaces; in others the chin, as well as the abdomen, is brown with
cream-colored spots. The dorsal surfaces of some specimens are nearly
uniform dark brown with no reticulations. In others the dorsum is
paler brown with distinct darker mottling; in some of these there is
little mottling laterally, so that there is the effect of an
irregular, pale brown, dorsolateral stripe.
Tadpoles.—The tadpoles of this species were described by Rabb and
Mosimann (1955). Tadpoles obtained from streams at 3.3 kilometers
north and at 8.5 kilometers southeast of Zacualtipán, Hidalgo, are
like those described by Rabb and Mosimann in having ⅔ tooth rows,
peglike serrations on the beaks, and long rounded tails. The largest
tadpole (KU 60078) has small hind legs, a body length of 22 mm., and a
total length of 61 mm.
Remarks.—Taylor (1940:393) found frogs of this species in plants
along small spring-fed rivulets in an open meadow at El Chico
Parque Nacional. Also, he noted that active frogs dove into the
streams and took refuge in the mud on the bottom. Rabb and
Mosimann (1955:1) found this species along banks of tiny streams
in open meadows and noted that the frogs sought refuge in the
water. At El Chico Parque Nacional on June 8, 1960, I found Hyla
robertsorum under rocks along small rivulets by day; at night, when
the temperature was 14° C., frogs were sitting on rocks and in
junipers overhanging a small stream. At the same locality on June
23 and 24, 1962, frogs of this species were found on rainy nights,
when the temperature varied from 10 to 12° C. At this time the
frogs were sitting on the grassy banks of rivulets in the meadow.
During the day Hyla robertsorum was found on the earthen banks
of the rivulets in places where dense growths of grass overhung
the streams. On December 23, 1959, one specimen of Hyla robertsorum
was found beneath a rock in a small stream in pine forest at
3.3 kilometers north of Zacualtipán.
Rabb and Mosimann (1955:1) obtained tadpoles of Hyla robertsorum
from quiet pools of a stream at El Chico Parque Nacional. I
found tadpoles in pools in rocky streams in pine forest at 3.3 kilometers
north and at 8.5 kilometers southeast of Zacualtipán. Four
[Pg 484]
completely metamorphosed juveniles obtained on June 8, 1960, at
El Chico Parque Nacional have snout-vent lengths of 30.6 to
32.0 mm. Gravid females were found at the same locality on June
8, 1960, and June 23, 1962.

Fig. 4. Map showing locality records for Hyla crassa,
Hyla pachyderma, and Hyla robertsorum.
[Pg 485]
Distribution.—Hyla robertsorum inhabits streams in the pine and fir
forests in the higher parts (2250 to 3050 meters) of the Sierra Madre
Oriental in extreme northern Puebla and eastern Hidalgo (Fig. 4).
Specimens examined.—Hidalgo: 16 km. W Agua Blanca, UMMZ 106432 (6);
El Chico Parque Nacional, CNHM 75786, 100124, KU 57650-71, 59824-5
(skeletons), 59914-5 (skeletons), 71269-95, 71757 (skeleton), UIMNH
10349-64, 27022-35, 39434-49, UMMZ 92462, 106401 (5), 106443
(tadpoles), USNM 114762-85, 134268; 3.3 km. N Zacualtipán, KU 53810,
60078 (tadpoles); 8.5 km. SE Zacualtipán, KU 60079 (tadpoles). Puebla:
Honey, UMMZ 95245.
Hyla pachyderma Taylor
Hyla pachyderma Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 28:308-310, pl. 27,
figs. 1-4, November 12, 1942 [Holotype.—USNM 115029 from Pan de Olla,
Veracruz, south of Tezuitlán, Puebla, México; Hobart M. Smith
collector]. Taylor and Smith, Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 95:588, June 30,
1945. Smith and Taylor, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 194:86, June 17, 1948;
Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull, 33:350, March 20, 1950. Rabb and Mosimann,
Occ. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 563:7-8, March 29, 1955.
Diagnosis.—Maximum snout-vent length in males 40 mm.; snout in
dorsal profile round; tarsal fold strong; inner metatarsal tubercle
round and moderate in size; outer metatarsal tubercle small and
indistinct; webbing on foot extending to middle of penultimate phalanx
of fourth toe; nuptial spines on thumb large; thoracic fold present;
anal opening at level of middle of thighs; dorsum dull grayish brown
with scattered indistinct dark flecks; venter cream-color mottled with
brown on throat and chest; flanks grayish brown with cream-colored
reticulations; anal stripe distinct, creamy white, sometimes extending
outward on thighs; white spots or line below anus; vocal slits absent.
Description.—The following description is based on USNM 115028 from
Pan de Olla, Veracruz. Adult male having a snout-vent length of 39.9
mm.; tibia length, 21.0 mm., 52.6 per cent of snout-vent length; foot
length (measured from proximal edge of inner metatarsal tubercle to
tip of longest toe), 20.5 mm.; greatest width of head, 12.8 mm., 32.1
per cent of snout-vent length; head length, 12.3 mm., 30.8 per cent of
snout-vent length. Snout short, in lateral profile bluntly rounded, in
dorsal profile rounded; canthus rounded; loreal region slightly
concave; lips thick, round, and not flaring; nostrils slightly
protuberant; internarial distance, 2.7 mm.; interorbital distance, 3.7
mm., somewhat broader than eyelid, 2.9 mm. A heavy dermal fold from
posterior corner of eye above tympanic region and then to insertion of
forearm; tympanum completely concealed. Forearm moderately robust;
distinct fold on wrist; prepollex enlarged bearing cluster of
moderate-sized, horny, nuptial spines continuous on edge of digit; row
of spines present on second finger; subarticular tubercles round,
small proximally and slightly larger distally; supernumerary tubercles
small and indistinct; three palmar tubercles, median and outer partly
fused; fingers long, moderately slender; discs moderately large;
length of fingers from shortest to longest, 1-2-4-3; second and fourth
fingers subequal in length; webbing between fingers rudimentary. Heels
overlap by about one-fourth length of shank when hind limbs adpressed;
tibiotarsal articulation extends to anterior edge of eye; tarsal fold
thick, low, extending nearly to heel; inner metatarsal tubercle
moderately large and round; outer metatarsal tubercle small and
indistinct; subarticular tubercles small and round; [Pg 486]
supernumerary tubercles small, present on proximal segments of digits; toes
moderately long and slender; length of toes from shortest to longest,
1-2-3-5-4; third and fifth toes subequal in length; toes about
three-fourths webbed; web extending to middle of penultimate phalanx
of fourth toe; discs rather small, about two-thirds size of those on
fingers. Anal opening directed posteroventrally at level of middle of
thighs; anal flap slightly elongate; thick, transverse dermal fold
above anus. Skin of dorsum and ventral surfaces of limbs, except
thighs, smooth; skin of chin, belly, and ventral surfaces of thighs
granular; thoracic fold present. Tongue nearly round, slightly notched
behind, and barely free posteriorly; vomerine teeth 3-3, situated on
posteroventral edges of small, transverse vomerine ridges between
rather large triangular inner nares; no vocal slits.
Color (in alcohol) of dorsal surfaces of head, body, and limbs dull
grayish brown with indistinct scattered darker flecks; flanks grayish
brown with cream-colored reticulations; posterior surfaces of thighs
tan; chin cream-color, mottled with brown; belly creamy yellow; anal
stripe cream-color.
Variation.—In addition to the specimen described above three others
are known. One is a juvenile having a snout-vent length of 29.5 mm.,
and two are females having snout-vent lengths of 46.9 and 41.6 mm.
Variation in structure and coloration between the four specimens is
slight. In the females the tympani are partly visible and are about
one-third the diameter of the eye; the chest is mottled with brown;
the anal stripe extends laterally in the form of a row of
cream-colored dashes and spots onto the posterodorsal surfaces of the
thighs.
Remarks.—On the basis of the four specimens available for study,
Hyla pachyderma seems to be closely related to Hyla crassa and
Hyla robertsorum. In the Hyla bistincta group, Hyla pachyderma
is unique in having enlarged nuptial spines.
Taylor and Smith (1945:588) stated that the frogs were found on
bushes and weeds beside a small, bounding stream near Pan de Olla.
I have searched unsuccessfully for this species in the area around
Pan de Olla and Tezuitlán.
Distribution.—This species is known only from a stream at an
elevation of about 1600 meters on the Atlantic slopes of the Sierra
Madre Oriental in central Veracruz (Fig. 4).
Specimens examined.—Veracruz: Pan de Olla, south of Tezuitlán,
Puebla, USNM 115026-9.
Hyla crassa (Brocchi)
Cauphias crassus Brocchi, Bull. Soc. Philom. Paris, ser. 7, 1:130,
1877 [Holotype.—MNHN 6331 from "Mexico;" Adolphe Boucard collector].
Cauphias crassum Brocchi, Études des batraciens de l'Amérique
Centrale, p. 64, pl. 12, fig. 4, 1882. Díaz de León, Indice de los
batracios que se encuentran en la República Mexicana, p. 21, June,
1904. Kellogg, Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus., 160:118-120, March 31, 1932.
Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 26:392, November 15, 1940. Rabb and
Mosimann, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 563:7, March 29,
1955.
Hyla crassa, Boulenger, Catalogue Batrachia Salientia, 2nd. Ed., p.
396, February 1, 1882. Günther, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Reptilia
and Batrachia, p. 281, September, 1901. Nieden, Das Tierreich, Amphibia,
[Pg 487]
Anura 1, p. 248, June, 1923. Smith and Taylor, Bull. U. S.
Natl. Mus., 194:86, June 17, 1948. Taylor, Amer. Mus. Novitates,
1437:20, December 7, 1949.
Hypsiboas crassus, Cope, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 32:14, 1887.
Hyla robustofemora Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 26:389-393,
figs. 3-4, November 27, 1940 [Holotype.—UIMNH 25050 (formerly EHT-HMS
16314) from Cerro San Felipe, 15 kilometers northeast of Oaxaca,
Oaxaca, México; Edward H. Taylor collector]; Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull.,
28:310, November 15, 1942. Smith and Taylor, Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus.,
194:86, June 17, 1948. Taylor, Amer. Mus. Novitates, 1437:20, December
7, 1949. Smith and Taylor, Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 33:339, March 20,
1950. Rabb and Mosimann, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan,
563:7, March 29, 1955.
Plectrohyla crassa, Hartweg, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ.
Michigan, 437:1, June 30, 1941. Stuart, Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ.
Michigan, 455:6, January 5, 1942.
Diagnosis.—Maximum snout-vent length in males 54 mm.; snout in
dorsal profile round; tarsal fold strong; inner metatarsal tubercle
small and elliptical; outer metatarsal tubercle small, flat, and
indistinct; foot fully webbed; nuptial spines on thumb small; thoracic
fold absent; anal opening at level of middle of femur; dorsum dull
olive-green; belly creamy yellow; chin gray with yellow flecks; flanks
dull olive-green with scattered cream-colored spots; and stripe faint,
cream-color; vocal slits absent.
Description.—The following description is based on UIMNH 25050 from
Cerro San Felipe, Oaxaca. Adult male having a snout-vent length of
53.7 mm.; tibia length, 26.9 mm., 50.1 per cent of snout-vent length;
foot length (measured from proximal edge of inner metatarsal tubercle
to tip of longest toe), 25.4 mm.; greatest width of head, 17.6 mm.,
32.8 per cent of snout-vent length; head length, 16.0 mm., 29.8 per
cent of snout-vent length; diameter of eye, 5.4 mm.; diameter of
tympanum, 1.5 mm., 27.8 per cent of diameter of eye. Snout short, in
lateral profile bluntly rounded, in dorsal profile broadly round;
canthus absent; loreal region nearly flat; lips thick and not flaring;
nostrils barely protuberant; internarial distance, 3.8 mm.;
interorbital distance, 4.7 mm., somewhat broader than width of eyelid,
3.8 mm. Heavy dermal fold from posterior corner of eye above tympanum
and then to insertion of forearm; tympanum concealed above, its
diameter about equal to its distance from eye. Forearm thick; distinct
fold on wrist; prepollex enlarged bearing patch of small nuptial
spines continuous on side of digit; similar patch on second finger;
subarticular tubercles small and round, none bifid; few supernumerary
tubercles on proximal segments of digits; large, flat palmar tubercle;
fingers long and slender; length of fingers from shortest to longest,
1-2-4-3; discs moderately large; rudimentary web between second and
third fingers and between third and fourth. Legs thick; heels overlap
by about one-fourth length of shank when hindlimbs adpressed;
tibiotarsal articulation extends to posterior corner of eye; tarsal
fold thick, extending to heel; inner metatarsal tubercle small and
elliptical; outer metatarsal tubercle small, flat, and indistinct;
subarticular tubercles small and round; single row of supernumerary
tubercles on proximal segments of each digit; toes moderately short
and slender; length of toes from shortest to longest, 1-2-3-5-4; toes
fully webbed; flap of skin on inner surface of first toe; discs about
same size as those on fingers. Anal opening directed posteroventrally
at middle of thighs; anal sheath moderately elongate; small tubercles
below anal opening. Skin of dorsum rather smooth, somewhat
[Pg 488]
granular on dorsal surfaces of limbs; skin of chin and belly moderately
granular; that of posterior surfaces of thighs smooth; no thoracic
fold. Tongue nearly round, shallowly notched posteriorly, and free for
about one-fourth its length; vomerine teeth 5-5, situated on rounded
ridges between small inner nares; no vocal slits.
Color (in alcohol) dull olive-green on dorsal surfaces of head, body,
and limbs; flanks dull olive-green with scattered cream-colored spots;
posterior surfaces of thighs grayish brown with faint creamy mottling;
chin gray with cream-colored spots; belly creamy yellow, suffused with
gray posteriorly; undersides of feet and webbing gray; anal stripe
faint, pale cream-color.
Variation.—The only other known specimen (MNHN 6331) is a female
having a snout-vent length of 53.7 mm. and resembling the specimen
described above in most details of morphology. In MNHN 6331 the
tympanum is completely concealed, and the 8-7 vomerine teeth are
arranged in two irregular rows. The female has more cream-colored
mottling on the flanks and posterior surfaces of the thighs and more
distinct mottling on the throat than the male described above.
Remarks.—The systematic status of Cauphias crassus Brocchi has
been in doubt since the time of the original description. Brocchi
(1877:130) stated: "Les dernieres phalanges sont obtuses, tronqués a
leur extrémité antérieure." Brocchi placed the species in his genus
Cauphias (type species, C. guatemalensis), which he considered to
be related to Hylodes ( = Eleutherodactylus in the sense used by
Brocchi); he thereby placed Cauphias in his Hylodidae ( =
Leptodactylidae, in part). This idea of relationships was perpetuated
by Barbour (1927:96), who reported on the second known specimen of
Cauphias guatemalensis and stated: "When I dissected the sternum I
was at once struck by its similarity to Noble's figures of
transitional types between arciferal and firmisternal forms. The
Cauphias sternum recalls some of his figures for Sminthillus and
Eleutherodactylus. This genus is probably most closely related to
the latter and has probably become highly modified to meet some
peculiar environmental condition or on account of some specialized
habits as yet unknown." Kellogg (1932:118) placed Cauphias in the
Leptodactylidae and stated that the terminal phalanges are T-shaped.
Hartweg (1941:1) considered Plectrohyla to be the correct generic
name for Cauphias guatemalensis; he thereby relegated Cauphias to
the synonomy of Plectrohyla. Hartweg (1941:9) further showed that
the terminal phalanges of Plectrohyla guatemalensis were not
T-shaped and that intercalary cartilages were present. Thus, he
correctly concluded that Plectrohyla guatemalensis (and P. crassa
by implication) was a member of the family Hylidae. Stuart (1942:6)
followed Hartweg's allocations and further suggested that Plectrohyla
crassa might be the same species as Hyla
[Pg 489]
robustofemora Taylor. In his description of H. robustofemora
Taylor (1940:392), who had not examined the type of Cauphias crassus,
stated that were it not for the statements of Brocchi and Kellogg that
C. crassus has T-shaped terminal phalanges, "I might suspect I had
before me a specimen of Cauphias closely related to crassum."
I have compared the type of Cauphias crassus with that of Hyla
robustofemora. With the exception of the minor differences mentioned
in the preceding section on variation, the specimens are
alike, leaving little doubt that they represent the same species. The
statements of Brocchi and Kellogg to the contrary, the type of
Cauphias crassus possesses intercalary cartilages between the penultimate
and terminal phalanges; the latter are not T-shaped, but
as in the type of Hyla robustofemora, resemble those typical of
Hyla. On the basis of the morphological characters, as pointed out
for Hyla robustofemora by Taylor (1940:392), Hyla crassa is a
member of the Hyla bistincta group.
Distribution.—This species is definitely known only from a small stream at
an elevation of 2300 meters in the mountains of central Oaxaca (Fig. 4).
Specimens examined.—Oaxaca: Cerro San Felipe, UIMNH 25050. "Mexico,"
MNHN 6331.
RELATIONSHIPS
The evolutionary trend in the members of the Hyla bistincta group is
towards aquatic habits. Hyla bistincta, the least specialized
species in the group, has relatively short fingers, webbing between
the fingers, a truncate, high snout, and relatively large subarticular
and supernumerary tubercles. Hyla charadricola resembles bistincta
in having relatively short fingers, a slight amount of webbing, and a
truncate snout. Apparently these two species are more closely related
to one another than either is to the other species in the group. Hyla
robertsorum, pachyderma, and crassa are the most aquatic members
of the group. These species are closely related, possibly conspecific.
All have round, sloping snouts, robust forearms, long, unwebbed
fingers, and large webbed feet. Both H. pachyderma and H. crassa
seem to be advanced beyond H. robertsorum. If small nuptial spines,
moderately webbed feet, and absence of a well-defined thoracic fold
are considered to be less advanced than large nuptial spines and a
strong thoracic fold, as in H. pachyderma, or fully webbed feet, as
in H. crassa, then H. robertsorum must be considered to be less
advanced than H. pachyderma or H. crassa.
Members of the Hyla bistincta group inhabit mountain streams.
[Pg 490]
The frogs can be found along these streams throughout the year. Since in
most stream-breeding hylids there is no migration to breeding sites,
the breeding call does not function to attract females to the breeding
site. Apparently voices are lacking in all members of the Hyla
bistincta group, except in Hyla bistincta. The presence of vocal
slits and the ability to call further indicate that Hyla bistincta
is the primitive member of this group.
Members of the Hyla bistincta group and the species of Plectrohyla
closely resemble each other in osteology and body form of the adults
and in structure of the tadpoles. This resemblance suggests a close
relationship between the two groups. Plectrohyla apparently evolved
from an ancestral stock resembling the extant Hyla bistincta.
Probably this stock gave rise independently to Plectrohyla and to
the Hyla robertsorum-pachyderma-crassa complex. In the former the
voice was retained, and a projecting prepollex spine developed,
whereas in the latter the voice was lost, and the prepollex spine did
not project. Plectrohyla lives in mountain streams in the
Chiapan-Guatemalan highlands; the Hyla robertsorum-pachyderma-crassa
complex inhabits similar environments in the Sierra Madre Oriental in
México. Hyla charadricola also lives in the Sierra Madre Oriental,
whereas Hyla bistincta is widespread in the mountains of México
southeastward to the Isthmus of Tehuantepec.
[Pg 491]
LITERATURE CITED
Barbour, T.
1927. Cauphias rediscovered. Copeia, no. 165:96-98, December 23.
Brocchi, P.
1877. Note sur quelques batraciens hylaeformes recueillis au Mexique et
au Guatemala. Bull. Soc. Philom. Paris, ser. 7, 1 (3):122-132.
Duellman, W. E.
1961. The amphibians and reptiles of Michoacán, México. Univ. Kansas
Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 15:1-148, pls. 1-6, December 20.
Hartweg, N.
1941. Notes on the genus Plectrohyla, with descriptions of new species.
Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 437:1-10, pl. 1, June 30.
Kellogg, R.
1932. Mexican tailless amphibians in the United States National Museum.
Bull. U. S. Natl. Mus., 160:iv + 224 pp., pl. 1, March 31.
Rabb, G. B. and Mosimann, J. E.
1955. The tadpole of Hyla robertsorum, with comments on the affinities
of the species. Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 563:1-9,
March 29.
Shannon, F. A.
1951. Notes on a herpetological collection from Oaxaca and other localities
in Mexico. Proc. U. S. Natl. Mus., 101:465-484, May 17.
Stuart, L. C.
1942. Descriptions of two new species of Plectrohyla Brocchi, with comments
on several forms of tadpoles. Occas. Papers Mus. Zool. Univ.
Michigan, 455:1-14, January 5.
Taylor, E. H.
1940. New species of Mexican Anura. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 41:385-405,
November 27.
1948. A new hylid frog from eastern Mexico. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus.
Nat. Hist., 1:259-262, August 16.
1949. A new hylid frog from central Veracruz. Copeia, 1949 (4):272-274,
pl. 1, December 15.
Taylor, E. H. and Smith, H. M.
1945. Summary of the collections of amphibians made in México under
the Walter Rathbone Bacon Traveling Scholarship. Proc. U. S.
Natl. Mus., 95:521-613, pls. 18-32, June 30.
Transmitted June 24, 1963.
29-8590
Featured Books

A New Subspecies of Slider Turtle (Pseudemys scripta) from Coahuila, México
John M. Legler
o.Pseudemys scripta taylori new subspecies(Pls. 9-12, Figures 1 & 2)Holotype.—Univ. Kansas Mus...

Pleistocene Pocket Gophers From San Josecito Cave, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
Robert J. Russell
the caveis provided by Miller (1943:143-144).Animal remains recovered from San Josecito Cave are amo...

Noteworthy Mammals from Sinaloa, Mexico
Ticul Alvarez, J. Knox Jones, and M. Raymond Lee
in Sinaloa with the aim of acquiring materialssuitable for treating the entire mammalian fauna of t...

The Boy Hunters
Mayne Reid
ver, about a mile below the village. I say it stood there many years ago; but it is very likely that...

The Scouts of the Valley
Joseph A. Altsheler
human figure, moved swiftly up one of the twin streams that form the Ohio. The water, clear an...

The Book of Nonsense
Edward Lear
There was a Young Lady of Ryde, Whose shoe-strings were seldom untied; S...

Le Vingtième Siècle: La Vie Électrique (French)
Albert Robida
ennes et terriennes ordonnaun dégel factice et le poste du grand réservoir d'électricité N (del'...

Watchbird
Robert Sheckley
t he had run on watchbird'sresourcefulness, the other talkingabout the new recharging apparatus.The ...
Browse by Category
Join Our Literary Community
Subscribe to our newsletter for exclusive book recommendations, author interviews, and upcoming releases.
Comments on "A Review of the Frogs of the Hyla bistincta Group" :