The Project Gutenberg eBook of A New Species of Frog (Genus Tomodactylus) from Western México



This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online
at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States,
you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located
before using this eBook.


Title: A New Species of Frog (Genus Tomodactylus) from Western México



Author: Robert G. Webb



Release date: February 3, 2010 [eBook #31175]

Most recently updated: January 6, 2021



Language: English



Credits: Produced by Chris Curnow, Joseph Cooper and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net




*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A NEW SPECIES OF FROG (GENUS TOMODACTYLUS) FROM WESTERN MÉXICO ***

University of Kansas Publications

Museum of Natural History



Volume 15, No. 3, pp. 175-181, 1 fig.

March 7, 1962



A New Species of Frog (Genus Tomodactylus)

from Western México


BY


ROBERT G. WEBB


University of Kansas

Lawrence

1962




University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History



Editors: E. Raymond Hall, Chairman, Henry S. Fitch,

Theodore H. Eaton, Jr.



Volume 15, No. 3, pp. 175-181, 1 fig.

Published March 7, 1962


University of Kansas

Lawrence, Kansas


PRINTED BY

JEAN M. NEIBARGER, STATE PRINTER

TOPEKA, KANSAS

1962




29-1923



[Pg 177]


A New Species of Frog (Genus Tomodactylus)

from Western México.


BY


ROBERT G. WEBB


Thirteen specimens of frogs collected in the summers of 1960
and 1961 in the Mexican states of Durango and Sinaloa represent
a heretofore unnamed species. The specimens have been deposited
in the Museum of Natural History of the University of Kansas
(KU) and in the Museum of Michigan State University (MSU).
The species may be named and described as follows:


Tomodactylus saxatilis new species


Holotype.—KU 63326 (Fig. 1); obtained eight miles west of El Palmito,
Sinaloa, approximately 6100 feet, on 23 June 1961; original field number,
2354 of Robert G. Webb.


Paratypes.—A total of 12 specimens: KU 63327-33, same data as holotype,
23-25 June 1961; MSU 4085-88, two miles north of Pueblo Nuevo, Durango,
approximately 6000 feet elevation, 24 July 1960; MSU 4089, one half mile
west of Revolcaderos, Durango, approximately 6600 feet, 29 July 1961.


Diagnosis.—A species of Tomodactylus possessing the following combination
of characters: (1) tips of two outer fingers truncate, about twice width
of narrowest part of digit; (2) tympanum small, less than one half diameter
of eye; (3) ventral surfaces smooth; (4) contrasting marbled pattern on back
and top of head, and (5) venter whitish, lacking dark marks.


Description of holotype.—Adult male; snout-vent length, 31.5 (measurements
are in millimeters and were taken by means of dial calipers reading to
one tenth of a millimeter); width of head, 11.2; length of head, 10.3; horizontal
diameter of eye, 3.1, and of tympanum, 1.2; distance from eye to nostril, 3.8;
internarial width, 2.9; interorbital width, 4.1; width of eyelid, 2.5; lumbar
gland (left side), 7.0 x 2.6; distance from axilla to groin, 15.2; tibial length,
12.7; length of foot, 13.1.


Head slightly wider than body; tip of snout rounded, slightly truncate;
canthus rounded; tympanum small, less than one half diameter of eye; tympanum
having posterior margin ill-defined, separated from eye by distance
about equal to diameter of tympanum; diameter of eye slightly less than distance
from eye to nostril; width of eyelid about two thirds interorbital width;
paratoid gland indistinct; lumbar glands high, separated from insertion of leg
by about one millimeter; back and sides of body having low, scarcely elevated
pustules; top of head, limbs and venter smooth; few low, whitish pustules
below and behind tympanum, and low on sides of body; posterior surface of
thighs and anal region pustulate; one pair of whitish postanal spots; ventral
disc attached near insertion of legs, lacking conspicuous transverse fold; skin
loose on throat, chest and abdomen.


[Pg 178]
Digits not webbed; tips of two outer fingers truncate, having terminal
transverse grooves, about twice width of narrowest part of digit; digits of
first and second fingers slightly expanded; fingers from shortest to longest,
1-2-4-3, first only slightly shorter than second; three palmar tubercles; inner
palmar tubercle about one third size of large median tubercle; outer tubercle
about one tenth size of large median tubercle; four supernumerary palmar
tubercles; tips of toes slightly wider than narrowest part of digits; toes from
shortest to longest, 1-2-5-3-4, second only slightly shorter than fifth; inner
metatarsal tubercle about four times size of small outer metatarsal tubercle;
supernumerary tubercles on foot small; no tarsal fold; heels touching when
tibiae adpressed to thighs; tibiotarsal articulation reaching eye when leg
adpressed to side of body.


Contrasting marbled pattern on back and top of head; contrasting, mostly
barred, pattern on limbs; ventral surfaces whitish, lacking dark marks, but
having minute dark peppering; marbling of dorsal surfaces blackish and
whitish in preservative.


Vomerine teeth lacking; internal choanae lateral, partly concealed by
maxillaries; tongue smooth, elongate, shallowly notched distally, free for about
half its length; vocal sac median; internal vocal slits large and near angle of jaw.


Variation.—Twelve males closely resemble the holotype. Two specimens
from Pueblo Nuevo are soft and not well preserved. The ranges of variation
(means in parentheses) for the 13 males comprising the type series are: snout-vent
length, 25.5-31.5 (27.9); width of head, 9.7-11.2 (10.5); diameter of
eye, 2.9-3.6 (3.2); horizontal diameter of tympanum, 1.1-1.8 (1.4); length
of tibia, 11.1-13.1 (12.1); length of foot, 11.0-13.1 (12.1).


The pale ground color of the marbled pattern in most specimens is least
extensive on the back and arms, but most extensive on the legs. The lumbar
glands are slightly elevated and conspicuous, and in KU 63328 are extremely
protuberant, or (KU 63330) evident on left side but flattened and indistinct
on right side. The back is rough having low, scarcely elevated pustules, but
becomes less rough anteriorly and most of the top of head is smooth. The
three specimens from Pueblo Nuevo, Durango, differ slightly from the other
specimens examined in lacking pairs of postanal white spots, and in having
smooth backs (slightly pustulate in MSU 4088). The tibiotarsal articulation
fails to reach the eye in KU 63330. The small inner palmar tubercle is
continuous with the large median tubercle on the right hand of KU 63330, and
lacking on both hands of KU 63329 and on the left hand of KU 63328. The
tip of the tongue is entire in some specimens and in others has an irregular
margin.


Coloration of living specimens.—Marbled pattern on back and top of head
of dark brown to blackish on yellowish-gold; pattern slightly less contrasting
on limbs than on back, consisting of brown to grayish on pale yellow; side
of head and body grayish sometimes having pale yellow to whitish spots;
iris blackish having fine reticulation of yellowish to greenish-gold; venter dirty
white.


Habitat.—The three records of occurrence for Tomodactylus
saxatilis
are in a mixed boreal-tropical habitat, which is transitional
between a pine-oak forest at higher elevations and a tropical deciduous
[Pg 179]
forest at lower elevations. The mixed boreal-tropical habitat
is most conspicuous at elevations between approximately 7800 and
5500 feet on southerly exposed slopes of barrancas and arroyos of
the dissected plateau of the Sierra Madre Occidental. The mixed
boreal-tropical habitat occurs for approximately 30 miles along the
paved highway (Mexican Highway 40) between Cd. Durango,
Durango, and Mazatlán, Sinaloa. The records of occurrence in
those states that are along this highway are separated by 14.5 miles
(via road).



FIG 1.
Fig. 1. Tomodactylus saxatilis new species, adult male, KU 63326,
holotype (× 2), dorsal view.


The terrain consists of occasional level areas, but is mostly of
steep hillsides. Dominant trees are large oaks and pines; a characteristic
pine is the sad or drooping-needle pine, locally called
"pino triste." The vegetational cover is usually open, including
grasses, small oaks and pines, broad-leaved shrubs and herbs,
prickly pears, magueys, thorny acacias, bracken fern, and epiphytes
in trees. Ferns occur in moist protected places, and orchids are
occasional, sometimes in trees.


[Pg 180]
Outcrops of rock, boulder-strewn areas, and occasional rock
slides (talus) also characterize the terrain. Tomodactylus saxatilis
seems to be restricted to rocky habitats. The individuals collected
were detected when they called at night from within crevices of
rocks or from exposed perches on rocks and boulders; some calling
frogs were out of reach on steep rock walls. The call is a single,
loud, high peep.


Comparisons.—Dixon (1957) recognized six species of Tomodactylus
(nitidus, dilatus, albolabris, angustidigitorum, fuscus and grandis) in his
revision of the genus. Another species (rufescens) was subsequently described
by Duellman and Dixon (1959). Tomodactylus saxatilis differs from all the
species named immediately above by the combination of characters given in
the diagnosis. Tomodactylus saxatilis differs from nitidus, angustidigitorum
and grandis in having the tips of the two outer fingers widened and truncate;
saxatilis differs from dilatus, albolabris, fuscus and rufescens in having a smooth
venter (not pustulate), a contrasting pale and dark marbled pattern on the
back, and a lack of "flash" colors on the femora.


Tomodactylus saxatilis, having lumbar glands, also resembles three species
referred to the genus Syrrhophus. Tomodactylus macrotympanum was described
by Taylor (1940:496, 497) as having a large, moderately distinct
lumbar gland; the species was referred to the genus Syrrhophus by Dixon
(op. cit.:384). According to Firschein (1954:55), Syrrhophus smithi and
S. petrophilus have elongate lumbar glands shaped like those in Tomodactylus.
Tomodactylus saxatilis resembles macrotympanum, smithi and petrophilus
more than it does other species; all four attain large maximal sizes, and have
lumbar glands, mostly smooth ventral surfaces, three palmar tubercles (sometimes
absent in saxatilis), and usually contrasting dorsal patterns (reduced to
flecks and spots in all species except saxatilis). Tomodactylus saxatilis differs
from macrotympanum in having an extensive marbled dorsal pattern and a
small tympanum, and differs from smithi and petrophilus in having a marbled
dorsal pattern and the tips of the outer two fingers widened and truncate.
Tomodactylus saxatilis differs from all other named species of Syrrhophus in
having conspicuous lumbar glands and in lacking inguinal glands.


Remarks.—The characteristics delimiting the genera Tomodactylus
and Syrrhophus are not agreed upon by all workers (see discussions
by Firschein, 1954:50; Langebartel and Shannon, 1956:164;
and Dixon, 1957:383). I have referred saxatilis to the genus Tomodactylus
on the basis of a lumbar gland, which was considered a
distinguishing character for the genus by Smith and Taylor
(1948:46) and Langebartel and Shannon (1956:165). Lumbar
glands are longer than broad, at least one third the distance from
axilla to groin, lateral and usually high, and often conspicuous and
protuberant. The elevation or flatness of the lumbar glands seems
to be due to individual variation; living specimens in the field had
conspicuous and protuberant, or non-elevated, indistinct lumbar
glands. Lumbar glands are not to be confused with inguinal glands,
[Pg 181]
which are roundish, often yellowish, sometimes diffuse, lateral but
low, often inconspicuous, and usually not protuberant. Inguinal
glands occur in the genus Microbatrachylus and in some species of
Eleutherodactylus, and have been described as flat, or low, or small,
or indistinct for most species of Syrrhophus.


For financial assistance with field work I am grateful to Rollin
H. Baker, and those individuals who administer the Michigan State
University Development Fund and the Bache Fund of the National
Academy of Sciences (Grant No. 463). I am grateful also to
J. Keever Greer, Donald F. Switzenberg, and Rudolph A. Scheibner
for aid in the field, to Edward H. Taylor, James R. Dixon, and
William E. Duellman for profitable discussions, and to Thomas
Sweringen for figure 1. The specific name alludes to the habitat
(Latin, saxatilis = found among rocks).


LITERATURE CITED


Dixon, J. R.


1957. Geographic variation and distribution of the genus Tomodactylus
in Mexico. Texas Journ. Sci., 9(4):379-409, 5 figs., 1 map, December.


Duellman, W. E., and Dixon, J. R.


1959. A new frog of the genus Tomodactylus from Michoacan, Mexico.
Texas Journ. Sci., 11(1):78-82, 1 fig., 1 table, March.


Firschein, I. L.


1954. Definition of some little-understood members of the leptodactylid
genus Syrrhophus, with a description of a new species. Copeia, 1954, 1:48-58, February 19.


Langebartel, D. A., and Shannon, F. A.


1956. A new frog (Syrrhophus) from the Sinaloan lowlands of Mexico.
Herpetologica, 12(3):163-165, 2 figs., September 1.


Smith, H. M., and Taylor, E. H.


1948. An annotated checklist and key to the Amphibia of Mexico. Bull.
U. S. Nat. Mus., No. 194, pp. iv + 118.


Taylor, E. H.


1940. Herpetological miscellany. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 26(15):489-571,
10 pls., 7 figs., November 15.


29-1923

        

Comments on "A New Species of Frog (Genus Tomodactylus) from Western México" :

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join Our Literary Community

Subscribe to our newsletter for exclusive book recommendations, author interviews, and upcoming releases.